I recharted the pattern to make sure I understood it. Aisling warns that she's not always perfect at noting thread orientation vs tablet orientation for her charts, but since she likes to chart top-down and I like to chart bottom-up it ended up being kind of moot. She does have a row 37 in the chart that seems to be unnecessary. Also, as charted, there ends up being a white blip on rows 1 and 36 which doesn't seem to be in the woven band that's in the photograph on page 100. For those two rows, I push down the white thread before passing the shuttle through the shed. I could have turned back and forward instead but that would have left a float, I believe, and the photo doesn't seem to show a float.
As suggested, I'm using white and blue for the zigzags and red for the edge, and a similar shade of blue for the weft. I'm using a darker red since the brighter one was not as colorfast as it should have been when I last used it, yikes! I've only done a few pattern repeats but I like it a lot so far. It weaves up pretty quickly and seems very rhythmic. So far it's fun rather than frustrating.
The original is wool and linen, but as usual, I'm doing cotton. The original is about 1cm wide. Mine is likely to be a bit thinner than that.
This band is somewhat similar to a band in Tablet Woven Treasures by Maikki Karisto and Mervi Pasanen. It too is a narrow band with zigzags of different widths. In their book, it's number 36. Kaukola, Kekomaki (KM 2489:5 H1), p. 176-177. The graveyard in which this particular fragment was found is thought to have been used during the Crusader Era, 1100-1300. So that's interesting.
Onward!
No comments:
Post a Comment