Fajum graveyard sleeve fragment tablet-woven trim

'Tis done.

I really like it!

After my last post, I thought about things for a while.  I looked at the photo in the book, and decided that I wanted the band to be symmetric.  So I eliminated the rows that required me to push down on the white.  It's now a 34-row pattern.  And symmetric.

The weaving went fairly smoothly, except when it didn't.  Did I mention that cats are terrible weaving assistants?  Also, if I stopped paying attention, I'd turn something forward when it needed to go backwards, or vice versa, or I'd lose my place and have to figure out where I was.

But it's done and it looks lovely.  There's one teeny little error that no one will notice.  The pattern repeats at the beginning of the band are only subtly different from the rest of the band, so that too won't be a problem.

The band ended up almost 1cm wide.  I had thought it might be 8-9mm but it's in the 9-10mm range, so it is pretty close in size to the original.  It's about 170cm long (66-67" long, 3/8" wide) before blocking.  I did 30 pattern repeats.

I hope the red is stable and nothing leaks onto the white when it gets blocked and washed.  I might get some of that dye-catcher stuff to try to ensure it.  I'll also iron this since it's a little twisty, not surprising given the design. 

I'll probably keep this in my repertoire.  I think it offers a lot of bang for the buck, a very striking design that isn't super-simple but is still straightforward and fairly quick to weave.

The newest tablet-weaving project (Fajum graveyard fragment)

I've been busy with other things these past few weeks.  However, today I started a new band.  As often happens, it wasn't the band I had thought I was going to do next.  It is another one of the Coptic bands in Aisling's book Tablet Woven Bands from Egypt (by Silvia "Aisling" Ungerechts).  It's in the 3/1 Twill section on p.100-101.  The book says that this was a small tablet-woven band on the wrist of a sleeve fragment.  The origin was described as "from the graveyard of Fajum".  She estimates it to be 5th to 7th century and typically Coptic.  The band is currently in the archives of the Skulpturensammlung und Museum fur Byzantinische Kunst, Berlin, Inv. no. 11429.

The band has only 8 tablets, 2 of which are edge tablets.  The design is white zigzags on a blue background with red edges.  Although that sounds simple, 3/1 broken twill and tie-downs (or whatever the opposite of a float is called) are used to create crisp lines.

I recharted the pattern to make sure I understood it.  Aisling warns that she's not always perfect at noting thread orientation vs tablet orientation for her charts, but since she likes to chart top-down and I like to chart bottom-up it ended up being kind of moot.  She does have a row 37 in the chart that seems to be unnecessary.  Also, as charted, there ends up being a white blip on rows 1 and 36 which doesn't seem to be in the woven band that's in the photograph on page 100.  For those two rows, I push down the white thread before passing the shuttle through the shed.  I could have turned back and forward instead but that would have left a float, I believe, and the photo doesn't seem to show a float.

As suggested, I'm using white and blue for the zigzags and red for the edge, and a similar shade of blue for the weft.  I'm using a darker red since the brighter one was not as colorfast as it should have been when I last used it, yikes!  I've only done a few pattern repeats but I like it a lot so far.  It weaves up pretty quickly and seems very rhythmic.  So far it's fun rather than frustrating.

The original is wool and linen, but as usual, I'm doing cotton.  The original is about 1cm wide.  Mine is likely to be a bit thinner than that.

This band is somewhat similar to a band in Tablet Woven Treasures by Maikki Karisto and Mervi Pasanen.  It too is a narrow band with zigzags of different widths.  In their book, it's number 36. Kaukola, Kekomaki (KM 2489:5 H1), p. 176-177.  The graveyard in which this particular fragment was found is thought to have been used during the Crusader Era, 1100-1300.  So that's interesting.

Onward!