Friday, May 30, 2025

Sprang Project #3 -- another bag

I want to make sprang bags, so I'm making sprang bags.


This one is using the same frame as project #1, to make a bag that is 12" deep or so.  I am using 16 pairs of loops (32 threads total).  The stitch patterns are the same as project #2 -- some 1/1 interlinking at top and bottom, and the allover holes pattern (2/2 alternating with 1/1) in the middle.  I finished the bottom as with project #1, and I sewed up the sides until the point where the 1/1 interlinking started.  There's a twisted thread drawstring.

My sewing still kind of sucks but I'm getting better.  This bag fits my water bottle better than bag #1 does, and it looks more relaxed when it's not stretched out.

I'm getting closer to what I think is the proper proportions for this kind of bag.

The photos are shown right after finishing, without any blocking and without doing much that will enable the tension to even out.




It's kind of fun to see this holes pattern just open right up once it's off the loom.  The bag that is just interlinking tends to close back up when it's not holding something.  This one stays relaxed.

So...  I've done my first reading of Collingwood's book on Sprang.  I'm sure a lot went over my head because I'm not ready to understand it yet.

It's shorter and less complex than his tablet-weaving book.

The 1/1 interlinking term seems to be used in his book.  Ditto for the "plait" and "overplait" terminology that Carol James also uses.

The 4-row holes pattern is something he calls a "hole design".  It's on p. 132, in a section called "using alternate rows of 1/1 and 2/2 interlinking (holes design)".  He says that this is "probably the most used method of patterning sprang fabrics" and that "[w]herever sprang has been practiced, this technique has been explored."

I like his charting method.  I also like Carol James' method and Jules Kliot's method (in the booklet published by Lacis).  I guess it's good that I'm pretty easy-going about sprang charting, at least for the simpler stuff.

The book went pretty quickly.  I have lots of inspiration for future projects as I learn more about this new-to-me ancient textile art, from Collingwood's book as well as other books and all the fun stuff I can find online.

I'm not sure what I'll do for the next sprang project (almost certainly another bag).  Probably play around with more interlinking and maybe a bit of interlacing.  (I know that that means now!  And ditto for intertwining!)  Maybe a bit of color or an eyelet pattern, or trying to zero in on the perfect bag proportions for various stitch patterns.  At some point I'll switch to different thread, too.  But for learning purposes, this nice fat cotton is perfect.


Wednesday, May 28, 2025

The Second Sprang Project -- also a small bag (but different from the first one)



It's shorter than the first bag, about 7" instead of the 12" of the first project.  And it's wider, both because I used twice as many ends/strings (24 loops, 48 elements, vs the first project's 12 loops and 24 elements), and because the pattern stitch I used really expands compared to the first bag's pattern.

I decided to build a frame with adjusting tension, the way Carol James draws out in her handout for the Braids and Bands group.  Off to the big box store...  After a certain amount of wandering around and making do with what was in stock, plus a return trip to exchange the one PVC elbow that didn't match the others, I was ready to tackle the project.  I love my PVC cutter, first purchased when building my little PVC tablet weaving loom.

Carol James does not give dimensions in the handout I have.  I decided to use the entire length of PVC pipe.  Wow, the loom is really big!  It'll be good for when I decide to do sashes and other long projects.

But for today, I wanted something smaller, so I could make a bag that wasn't 12" deep.  I took out the adjustable metal threaded rod and turned the frame into a square, 20" on a side.

I wanted to do new things.  So, for this bag, I chained the bottom shut.  And I used a different pattern stitch, an openwork honeycomb-ish pattern that was also used in the hairnet found on the 5th century BCE Danish bog body known as Haraldskær Woman.

I've seen this done as a bag or hairnet in a few places.  The source I mostly used today is Sally Pointer's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFVEVIn1xNw&ab_channel=SallyPointer "Make a Sprang Bag with Handles: all over holes/ Haraldskaer pattern."

It seemed pretty sedate while I was spranging away, but it really opened up once off the loom.  The bag is 8" wide and very stretchy.  It has a few repeats of plain interlinking before I started doing the openwork pattern, and finishes up with a pattern repeat of plain interlinking before the bag is chained shut.  After chaining the middle, I sewed each side up to where the pattern shifted from the openwork to the plain interlinking.

OK, now I've tried two stitches!

The first is "plain interlinking", or at least that's what I'm calling it for now.  It's a 2-row pattern.

1.  Twist 2 loops over 1 loop at the start, then 1 over 1, finishing with 1 over 2 at the end.  (I think that's the Z version.  The S version is opposite, but I did all Z for this bag.)  Carol James calls this the "plait row".

2.  Twist 1 loop over 1 loop all the way across.  Carol James calls this the "overplait row".

The second is this openwork pattern, which I guess for now I'll call the Haraldskaer pattern.  It's a 4-row pattern.

1.  Twist 2 loops over 2 loops, all the way across.

2.  Twist 1 loop over 1 loop all the way across.

3.  Twist 1 loop over 1 loop at the start, then 2 loops over 2 loops, finishing up with a 1 over 1 at the end.

4.  Twist 1 loop over 1 loop all the way across.

It was a fun stitch to do.  I like the pattern a lot.  Heck, I like both patterns a lot.

Other things I learned:

It is wise to run the drawstring through the loops before you take it off the loom and/or remove the string/stick going through them.  Trying to get them all picked up and contained on the drawstring was a bit of a pain.

The drawstring, a twisted cord, could stand to be a bit longer.  Did I mention that this is a very stretchy stitch pattern?

I'm pretty terrible at sewing up the sides.  Oh, well.  I'll probably improve with time.

I could have left long lengths at the beginning and ends of the warp, to use for sewing up the sides.  But I didn't.  Also, I started sewing from the bottom towards the top.  So it probably didn't matter anyway.

I was able to adjust the warp tension a bit, yay!  And my top and bottom gauges are still relatively similar.

A 20" frame leads to about 7" of spranging on each side before I close it up.  The other frame from yesterday (my tablet weaving loom, actually), which I think is about 28", leads to about 12" on each side before closing up.

I should probably make a few more frames that are smaller or more portable.

This bag will probably look better after blocking, but it already looks pretty good.


I've already had some requests for bags, even with my beginner-ish skills.  And requests for teaching.

I don't know what I will make next.

Sunday, May 25, 2025

The first sprang project -- a small bag



I have complete my very first sprang project and I am very pleased with myself.  It's a simple bag, very much following the project guidelines that are in Carol James' workshop that she did for the Braids and Bands mailing list.




Much was learned.

I used some Sugar and Creme cotton yarn I found in the depths of my oddballs stash.    I rigged up my little PVC tablet weaving loom into a simple frame.  I used 24 ends (12 pairs).

This is very much the most basic interlinking pattern.  Each row is 1 s 1, with the rows staggered.  In other words, one row is 1 x 1.  The other row starts with 2 x 1, has the middle be 1 x 1, and finishes with 1 x 2.

It spiraled quite a bit, of course, since all the twisting was in one direction.  But after sewing it up and scrunching it up, it seems a lot better.  I haven't yet blocked it so don't know how that will affect things.



Once I ran out of room in the middle, I finished it using the method in the handouts -- tie a thread around the middle, twice (in a figure 8), knot it, and then use the ends to sew up each side, matching the edges.  I wasn't particularly neat with that, alas, but hopefully it'll be better and closer to invisible than it was this time.  For a while, I was pretty sure I hadn't aligned the edges properly.  But it worked out, whew, and even if it's not perfect, it's not obvious.

I did a twisted-cord for a drawstring, running it through the top loops and then tying an overhand knot at one end.

It looks rather peculiar but it is indeed stretchy!  It'll fit around a water bottle.  The length and width aren't too different from how they looked on the loom -- about 12" long and about 2" wide.  My gauge is relatively consistent and I like the fabric that was created.

This very much has the vibe one would expect from a First Project.  But it is a successful project.  Now on to project #2...   I'm not sure what it will be, but my guess is another bag.

I'm having fun reading things about sprang by a variety of authors and also checking out whatever I can find on the 'net.  So many possibilities...


Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Sprang!

Apparently my little squirrel brain needs to try something new.

Today it is sprang.

I've not done it before, but I know people who have.  Also, I've had Carol James' website bookmarked for years, waiting for The Day.

Well, today was The Day.

I just wanted to do the basic moves, see if I understood.  Yup!

I'm not planning on keeping this -- it'll be unraveled soon and returned to its primordial yarn.



The top pic is what is looks like on the little PVC frame I had lying around.  I had thought I might need to tape dowels or knitting needles to move as the warp tightened.  But this is such a short piece that it wasn't a problem.  I did a figure-8 wrap around the top and bottom, found the cross, and started twisting.  I don't remember if I did a Z-twist or an S-twist, but whatever it was, I think I was consistent.  I could see the ends trying to twist by the time I got to the middle.  Hmm, looks like Z in the pic.




And here you can see that I did it!  It works!  Primitive technology, yay!!!!  A baby step, but it counts!  The world of sprang is at my fingertips!

I'm not sure what my first real project will be.  Probably a drawstring bag, because why not?  I need to rig up a better way to hold the warp and all those other fun things, too.  And then, yes, start exploring the possibilities.

There are other useful websites and video collections that showed the various moves in different ways and both whetted my interest and gave me confidence that I could tackle this without too much trouble.

I've also been checking out my vast collection of info on brocade tablet weaving, so that might be another new thing once I'm pretty sure I'm done with doing the tablet-woven gift bands.


Saturday, May 17, 2025

Musings on the trousers from Turfan (Tarim Basin)

I can't remember exactly how this started.  But I started watching this video with a friend, about the world's oldest known trousers.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pl7siWwzibs&t=71s&ab_channel=DeutschesArch%C3%A4ologischesInstitut

I already knew a bit about this, mostly because there was a fair amount of info that came out several years ago.  But I love the topic so it's always great to watch and read and learn more.

These are the trousers from the body of a man who was buried in Turfan, in the Tarim Basin, roughly 3000-ish years ago (13th to 10th century BCE).  The pants are carefully designed, woven, and constructed, and appear to have been created to be comfortable for someone who rode a horse.  Horse-related artifacts are found in the graves in this area, so it's not an unreasonable hypothesis.

I am fascinated by this part of the world, and the textiles are one of the things I'm fascinated by.

The pants are indeed very interesting.  They show that the artisans of the time were very skilled in a multitude of techniques.

Most of the cloth is woven in twill, similar to modern blue jeans.  The people here were weavers of wool plaid twill, which is also found among the weavers of Hallstatt and other Celtic weavers.  Which of course is interesting and the subject of much excitement and speculation from those who get excited and speculative about these sorts of things.  These pants have areas with stripes and tapestry-woven-like color patterns.

There are decorative bands near the ankles and knees (or lower legs).  They almost look like tablet weaving from a distance, but a closer view shows that they are not.  The video says that they are made from a twined technique that is similar to the New Zealand technique of taniko.  This is also the same twining technique used for the Native American Columbia Plateau baskets!  Not that this is a terribly revolutionary technique, but it is still very cool.  In other words, this is not evidence that these groups were all in contact with each other, but rather, that this technique has been independently re-invented many times.

It is always interesting how people take the same ideas and use them in different applications.  Even the Columbia Plateau baskets show some of this, with the original baskets made from strips of plant leaves and stems, and modern basket weavers often using commercially spun and manufactured cords and yarn.  But here are the exact same techniques used for weaving baskets and also for weaving cloth.

I have no idea why the creators of the Turfan man's pants decided to twine decorative patterns at various points along the warp.  Each piece of the pants is thought to have been woven as one piece, so it's not like the decorative band was sewn to the twill; it was made as part of the fabric creation process.  I don't know why there are several areas with ornamental embellishments -- do they have a utilitarian purpose?  Some other purpose (such as to mark the owner or weaver in some way, or to honor deities or avert the evil eye)?  Mostly ornamental because why not?

Here's another paper about the pants, linked from Carol James' blog: https://www.spranglady.com/uploads/7/7/0/8/77084287/17_2014_beck_et_al._qi_348_224-235.pdf



The photos are pretty decent, though not quite as detailed as I would like.  The paper also gives schematics should I wish to make my own version of these pants.  Assuming they were designed to be worn in real life, and aren't just some kind of funerary clothes or something someone had lying around or something.

Why Carol James?  Because there are sprang artifacts, and she is often the expert who is brought in to assist with that.  Yes, of course I want to make copies of those artifacts.  Which I suppose means that I'll need to learn sprang.  And an aside, though a lot of people already know this -- some of the oldest nalbinding artifacts yet discovered have been found in this region, though probably not in this particular grave.

Anyway.

The seams are covered with braids, and there's a drawstring at the waist.  Narrow wares!  And thus a proper topic for this blog.

The braids are the very common 4-strand braid that I was nattering on about a few months ago.  Some use two colors and some only one, I believe, though it's possible the apparent one-colored braid used two dark colors that look similar in the technical paper's photographs and/or that have degraded over the years.  The pic below is a two-color braid.



The drawstring is a standard twisted cord.  I think the drawstrings have been loosely knotted together with a slip knot but I'm not 100% sure yet.  The ends of the drawstrings aren't well preserved, but it kind of looks like one of the better preserved ends was dipped in something to keep it from unraveling.  Or maybe there used to be a knot or something and it's now gone, and the ends are kind of goopy from their slow deterioration over the millennia.




An aside -- there's also a paper linked from Carol James' site that talks about the dyes: https://www.spranglady.com/uploads/7/7/0/8/77084287/16_2014_kramell_et_al._qi_348_214-223-2.pdf

This paper analyzed the dyes and found chemicals consistent with madder for the red and indigo for the blue.  They concluded that the madder was probably local and the indigo was likely to have been imported since the local area was great for growing madder but more marginal for growing indigo-bearing plants.  Dunno, though -- the area had a ton of international trade, but also, it might well have been possible to grow both madder and, say, Japanese indigo locally.  The authors found evidence of red, blue, and brown dyes, but no yellow, interestingly enough.  I don't know how carefully they looked for it, or if the dye chemicals would have degraded, or if these graves didn't contain yellow textiles, or if the locals had something against yellow and green (green being an overdye of indigo/yellow or vice versa).  There was evidence that mordants were used for the dyeing, and the authors felt that these too could be acquired locally.

But back to the drawstrings!  Or actually, time to talk about the spinning.  Everything seems to be made from singles.  Many of the singles were spun S and some were spun Z, though it is possible that some of the photos are reversed.  For the drawstring, the braids, and the sewing thread, the artisans used several strands of this single-ply yarn rather than plying them.

The resolution of the photos is not quite good enough for me to see the weaving.  Are both warp and weft single-ply yarns?  Is there a consistent direction for warp or weft, i.e. are the both spun the same direction, different directions, or random?  And so on.

The paper on the dyes gives some spinning and plying info from various textiles they analyzed -- some S-singles, some Z-singles, and some sZ and some zS 2-ply yarns. So, it's not fully consistent.  And that implies that there were a lot of spinners around to acquire yarn from, probably.  In general, a spinner tends to have a preferred spinning direction, so the presence of S and Z singles implies more than one spinner.  Unless maybe there were rules or superstitions about which way to spin and thus it might vary, maybe.  I'm also interested in seeing how consistent the yarn thicknesses tend to be.

I haven't even touched on the clothing construction in any serious way since I mostly wanted to write about the braids and drawstrings and the twined decorative panels with a little about the spinning of the threads/yarns that made up the braids and drawstrings.

So all of the above is kind of stupid and unjointed.  But I still wanted to get my thoughts down while I remembered them.  I've probably forgotten some already, not that this is any great loss to humanity.  I need to re-read some of the old Silk Road stuff I have, and maybe go see what new things have been published since I last read about these topics.  I might add more references to this post, or, if I am so inspired, write another stupid and unjointed post.

And maybe I need to make some of these pants, or at least the braids.  Reminder to myself -- find out more about the braids and tassels briefly mentioned in the paper about dyes.  And think a bit more seriously about learning sprang, though maybe I want to explore more new-to-me techniques in braiding and tablet-weaving first.


Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Faster than expected -- Gift Band #4 (chevrons) is done!



For whatever reason, this band went very quickly.  I started with a 3 yard warp and ended up with about 92.5" of tablet-woven band, about 3/4" wide.  I maybe could have eked out another inch if I'd been really insistent, but I was pretty much ready to be done with it.  So it's done.

This was a nice follow-up to the previous band, which I had found so frustrating.


Here is a closer photo, so that the chevrons are more visible.

I have no idea why the original chart was called "Anglo Saxon 6th".  Is this meant to be a 4-threaded version of the Snartemo II band?  Is it based on a brocade pattern somewhere?  Is there actually a band with the threaded-in pattern in the chart?  Was the charter merely inspired by other Anglo Saxon and/or 6th century tablet-woven bands or even motifs in general before setting out to chart up his/her own pattern?  No idea.

What's next? I might do another gift band or two, or I might move on to something else.


Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Gift Band #4 in progress -- simple chevrons


Another gift band!

This is based on a Twisted Threads pattern called Anglo Saxon 6th, here: https://twistedthreads.org/pattern/wKXJR6DpDWy4o59uM

The recipient is OK with the following changes:

I'm turning all forward, instead of doing a forward/back twist-neutral pattern.  Therefore, this is all chevrons instead of chevrons and diamonds.  And instead of 1 red and 3 tan threads per tablet, it's red-yellow-green-yellow.

This is 16 tablets, 2 edge tablets per side and 12 pattern tablets, all 4-threaded.  I'm doing a 3 yard warp this time.

I decided to crank up the weight again on my weaving.  For a while, I've backed way off in hopes I can reduce the motif elongation.  But really, it doesn't seem to make much difference.  The higher weight makes it easier to keep things steady (i.e. the band doesn't bounce when I use my shuttle to push the weft down) and hopefully more consistent.  It'll make things a little tougher near the end, since a heavier weight needs more friction to keep it from sliding off the band.

I like it so far.

Saturday, May 10, 2025

Finished: yellow and white checkerboard gift band #3


It's finished!  I started with 4 yards (144") and ended up with a band that is 116"-ish inches long and about 3/4" wide.

If I do this kind of thing again, I'll need a darker yellow.  Also, I think there might be better ways to make a checkerboard.

I noticed (when I was messing up), that all-forward with 4 tablets of each color makes something that looks reasonably square and looked pretty good.  So that might be a possibility.  Otherwise, maybe I'd go with 6-8 tablets of each color, and do a few cycles of 2F2B before changing to the other color, as with Durham Seal tag #2.

Four tablets of each color still left the blocks elongated.  And the 4F4B version of double-face didn't quite fit with the color changes.  A friend is doing this pattern (well, not the same pattern, but the exact same turning sequence) using 6 tablets of each color.  Even her blocks are elongated, so it really is about 4 tablets not being wide enough.

It's OK, but I'm not fully satisfied with how this band turned out.  I didn't choose the pattern to follow, and I did not see a darker yellow thread in the stores.  The weaving is OK, especially after I gave up trying to loosen the weft tension in hopes of squaring up the blocks.  I kept it slightly loose but not sloppy loose.

I hope the recipient likes the band, and that it meets their needs.

What next?  I want to finish a doily I'm knitting.  And then, maybe another gift band.  I'll see what the recipient wants.  If there isn't specific guidance, maybe I'll do a checkerboard again, but with blue and green on white, 4 tablets per color, and doing an all-forward turning sequence, probably still with the alternating S and Z tablet orientation.  Or not.  We'll see.

I haven't thought beyond these gift bands so I'm not sure what's next once I'm on my own again.  Is it time to figure out if I hate brocading?  More two-hole and Sulawesi?  Something diagonal-ish or 3/1 twill or pack-idling?  Etc.


Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Gift Band #3: yellow and white checkerboard (in progress)

 


Here are the first few repeats of the next gift band -- yellow and white checkerboard with a black edge.  The recipient has specified the colors and also the chart to be used.

It's basically a 4F4B pattern, but in a way that works with the threading pattern to make it a simple double-face pattern.

The yellow is the darkest yellow sold at the nearby big box crafts store since they don't carry the full color range.  It's not contrast-y enough with the white, which is bugging me greatly.  I also would have preferred a bit more double-face to even out the texture of the different-colored boxes, something more similar to the Durham Seal Tag #2 (which is still on my to-do list).

Oh, well.  Hopefully the recipient will like it anyway.  I warped up 4 yards and hope to get at least 3 yards from it.

I had to buy new Aunt Lydia's thread since I didn't have enough of the white, yellow, or black left for this band.  Oddly, it doesn't feel like the stuff I bought several years ago.  Dunno if it's softer or limper or what, but my fingers believe that it's not the same.  It also tangles very easily, possibly more easily than the old stuff.

This would have been a perfect band for continuous warping.  Alas, I still do not have a good set-up for it.  I tried, but I still don't have a successful way to keep the skeins of thread from bouncing around and twisting around each other and otherwise misbehaving.  After I untangled that mess, it turned out to be faster to do a basic cut-and-thread method of setting up my tablets.  Which is stupid.

I'm also still trying to keep my weft tension a bit loose, to try to reduce the lengthening of the motifs.  Dunno if it's working.   I'm not quite as consistent with my width as I would like when I do that.  I have no idea if it's making a meaningful difference.

It makes me unhappy to be doing this band that isn't looking how I'd like it to look.  Though unfortunately I wasn't able to find a good contrast-y yellow, which means that just about anything I'd do wouldn't look right.  The weaving itself is harmless though I think the 4F4B turning sequence doesn't harmonize well with the color pattern, either.

Every band is a learning experience, but that doesn't mean I have to enjoy it at the time.